Back to work

Case Study / AI Search

AI-based search for a mature marketplace.

I designed an optional AI-search beta for ImmoScout24 that protected familiar search behavior while giving product and engineering teams a practical way to learn.

Context High-intent real estate search with established user habits.
Role UX strategy, interaction design, testing and product alignment.
Decision Keep AI optional, reversible and visibly connected to classic filters.
Impact Valuable AI learnings without negative impact on core search KPIs.
AI search entry point on the ImmoScout24 homepage
AI search entry point on the ImmoScout24 homepage

The Tension

Strategic, but unproven.

ImmoScout24 explored how AI could support discovery inside its core search journey. The product challenge was not simply to introduce AI, but to do it in a way that respected a search model millions of users already understood and trusted.

The risk was classic innovation theater: adding a novel interaction without improving the actual decision journey. My design responsibility was to create a testable experience that made room for learning without forcing users to abandon clarity and control.

Design Judgment

The senior decision was restraint.

01

Preserve trust

AI entered as a beta layer, not as a replacement for the established search system.

02

Keep control visible

User prompts were translated into familiar filters so people could understand and adjust the result.

03

Learn without pressure

The experience was optional and reversible, which made experimentation safer for users and the business.

Approach

Make AI fit classic search.

The first version treated AI as an alternative input method. Text and voice prompts were interpreted into the existing filter logic, which allowed the team to move quickly while preserving the underlying search behavior.

In usability testing, users found AI interesting but still preferred explicit filters for serious real estate decisions. That insight shaped the product direction: AI should support user intent, not hide the rules of the system.

AI search in the result list
Result list integration kept AI close to the existing search context.

Research Signals

Users valued predictability more than novelty.

Classical filters remained the anchor.

Most users preferred the search model they already knew, especially for high-stakes housing decisions.

Voice input had weak fit.

It was perceived as technically interesting, but not useful enough for the context.

Transparency mattered.

Users wanted to see how AI interpreted their intent and needed easy ways to correct it.

Outcome

A practical learning platform for responsible AI UX.

Product impact

AI adoption remained limited compared to classical search, but the beta did not weaken the performance or trust of the core journey.

Team impact

The initiative gave product, design, data and engineering teams concrete experience with generative AI systems in a real marketplace context.

Design lesson

AI works best in complex decision products when it increases clarity and control instead of asking users to surrender both.

Next

Explore another product story.

Contact

Let's talk product UX.